http://3dmark.com/3dm11/46533
Doesn't like Eyefinity too much
@4GHz and 950/1250.
Dr. B, how did you get 120,000MHz core overclock on your 5850!?
Mine says 90000MHz/130,000MHz, so I guess those numbers are not to be trusted at all.
| MysteryByte Computers http://mysterybyte.com/phpBB3/ |
|
| The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. http://mysterybyte.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2620 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Dr_BenD_over [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
bench em if you got em. First run (well second actually, the first run crapped out) http://3dmark.com/3dm11/27973 |
|
| Author: | GRIZZ [ Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/33560 |
|
| Author: | Monkeydee [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 1:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/38500 it yells at me about an unsupported driver... maybe i should update since i'm only running the catalyst 10.7's |
|
| Author: | CMDR Steve-O [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/46533 Doesn't like Eyefinity too much @4GHz and 950/1250. Dr. B, how did you get 120,000MHz core overclock on your 5850!? Mine says 90000MHz/130,000MHz, so I guess those numbers are not to be trusted at all. |
|
| Author: | Hali_Newf [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 8:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
steve-o your numbers are accurate if there was a decimal placed in front of the last two zeros. Damn fine score btw you pretty much wiped the floor with everyone else so far. |
|
| Author: | Dr_BenD_over [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 9:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
CMDR Steve-O wrote: http://3dmark.com/3dm11/46533 Doesn't like Eyefinity too much @4GHz and 950/1250. Dr. B, how did you get 120,000MHz core overclock on your 5850!? Mine says 90000MHz/130,000MHz, so I guess those numbers are not to be trusted at all. It looks like it's a few decimal points off and reading the MAX clocks, not the current clocks, that was a stock 725/1000 run. Max clocks are 1200/1400 |
|
| Author: | CMDR Steve-O [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
Hali_Newf wrote: steve-o your numbers are accurate if there was a decimal placed in front of the last two zeros. Damn fine score btw you pretty much wiped the floor with everyone else so far. 90000/120000 isn't right since my clocks were 950/1250. this is using the AMD GPU tool, which is way simpler and more accurate than stupid overdrive CCC appazola. GRIZZ's CPU/physics score was higher for some reason, even with my "massive" overclock Must be the DD2 memories.
|
|
| Author: | Hali_Newf [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
You should be running 1600+ I would go so far as to say 1800-2000Mhz oc'd. Time for a board/ram change! hehe |
|
| Author: | GRIZZ [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
Second run with cpu and gpu oc. http://3dmark.com/3dm11/58573 |
|
| Author: | Hali_Newf [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
I expect to get somewhere around this score Grizz |
|
| Author: | CMDR Steve-O [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
I saw an i7 O/C'd to 4.4GHz with a 5870 and it was 400pts higher than my score, so really that seems OK in my books. Apparently Crossfire doesn't work, SLI doesn't work, and unless your card is DX11 native, it won't work at all. The MHz on video cards never reports correctly, the search function is totally out to lunch and useless. This has got to be the biggest steamiest pile of crap crap benchmark ever crapped into the crapper. THE END! |
|
| Author: | Phonix [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
Ran this twice last night, crapped out on final test both times because Windows wanted to turn Aero off. Although the tech demos were pretty! My scores will probably look identical to alot of you. My system is nowhere near benching condition though, as I have a big clusterfudge of processes and services running. |
|
| Author: | Ern88 [ Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
Ran the test. Not too shabby for the old E8400 http://3dmark.com/3dm11/71851 |
|
| Author: | Antichrysler [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/82359 cpu left at stock gpu overclocked by CCC 775/1125 wonky windoze 7 install because was sold fake "lagit" key by forum member memory speed 1066mhz not bad for the old clunker,970BE needed methinks. Steve-o there's a fix for xfire in the newest profile available here. http://www.rage3d.com/cap/ |
|
| Author: | Hali_Newf [ Thu Dec 09, 2010 10:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The "Official" 3DMark11 Thread. |
it craps out when I run it. some tests run and others show a black screen and it seems to stall. http://3dmark.com/3dm11/117864?show_ads ... U2WCt7kLp6 P3768 - GPU oc and mild cpu oc to 3.6 it reads my ram all weird. All three sticks show 800 (x2) in cpuz. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|