Last visit was: It is currently Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:24 pm


All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: New Raptor! HAWT (MB please get in stock)
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:15 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:52 am
Posts: 2711
Location: HMCS Athabaskan
http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/Western_Digital_Velociraptor_300GB/

Image

I'll be skipping that Raptor 150GB purchase TYVM!

_________________
Gaming -Obsidian 800D-
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 | FX 9590 | H70 | 32GB G.Skill DDR3 | 256GB Vertex 4 | 7770 | 2560x1080 UWS Asus MX299

Server -Jesusbox Tx Mozart-
ASUS M5A97 R2.0 | FX 8350 | H50 | 16GB | 1TB Velo +19TB | 5770


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:02 pm 

Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:10 pm
Posts: 562
i don't think i could ever bring myself to spend $350 on a hard drive, especially for a part that is meaningless for gaming and when you consider 500GB drives are under $100.


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:43 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:52 am
Posts: 2711
Location: HMCS Athabaskan
You don't buy one for the capacity, you'd get one because speed is king and these are the new kings of the hill. SSD's are still too damn expensive.

_________________
Gaming -Obsidian 800D-
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 | FX 9590 | H70 | 32GB G.Skill DDR3 | 256GB Vertex 4 | 7770 | 2560x1080 UWS Asus MX299

Server -Jesusbox Tx Mozart-
ASUS M5A97 R2.0 | FX 8350 | H50 | 16GB | 1TB Velo +19TB | 5770


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 12:35 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:42 am
Posts: 733
Well how fast do you need to get your system up & running before you do anything with it that any HD will handle? lol You'll be running seconds before I will by using this then from that point on there isn't any noticeable difference. Congrats you spent $350 & I spent $120 to bad you beat me 2 seconds in bootup lol.

_________________
Windows 7 available here

Can you take on my brute?

See if you can beat this brute!

No try to beat me instead!


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:58 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:52 am
Posts: 2711
Location: HMCS Athabaskan
I would hope I'd do more with my computer than just boot it up. That's 2 seconds per day, at least. Plus say 5 seconds to load up whatever favourite game of the day is. Over say a 5 year timespan (because that's how long it'll take to upgrade it) that's 3.5 hours. Not to mention the fact that it is quieter and consumes less power than your 120$ jobbie. And it looks tres chic!

Yeah there is probably no real reason why enthusiasts love to buy raptors. That's why we're the enthusiasts. If there was an 32GB SSD out there for 350$ I'd buy that instead.

_________________
Gaming -Obsidian 800D-
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 | FX 9590 | H70 | 32GB G.Skill DDR3 | 256GB Vertex 4 | 7770 | 2560x1080 UWS Asus MX299

Server -Jesusbox Tx Mozart-
ASUS M5A97 R2.0 | FX 8350 | H50 | 16GB | 1TB Velo +19TB | 5770


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:33 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:34 am
Posts: 1117
Location: Eastern Passage
I just came here to post the exact same link but you beat me to it. Anyways, the benchmarks look good but what's shocking/weird is that it's using a smaller drive size than "regular" desktop drives. The first thing I thought after reading that was that 10k RPM is going to be spinning faster on the older (larger) Raptors so how does this thing beat it in speed, but I guess it has a few different tricks to help it accomplish that.

Definitely an interesting piece of tech but I won't be buying one any time soon. :)


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:09 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:42 am
Posts: 733
I used Raptors & since my system practically never shuts off I didn't notice Any difference from them or the $120 drive i'm using now in my new system when loading up a game.

Although I will say that a guy in my clan was dead set on Solid State Drives but is considering using these next. Probably because they are cheaper. lol.

Flama smaller drives spin faster as there's less rotating mass.

_________________
Windows 7 available here

Can you take on my brute?

See if you can beat this brute!

No try to beat me instead!


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:20 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:34 am
Posts: 1117
Location: Eastern Passage
Tony wrote:
Flama smaller drives spin faster as there's less rotating mass.


Then wouldn't the specs indicate the drive is spinning faster than 10,000 RPM, which is the same speed as the regular Raptors? If you have two cars driving with wheel rotations of 2,000 RPM and one car has 15" wheels and the other has 17" wheels which one is going to be moving faster? :wink:


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:03 am 

Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:31 pm
Posts: 295
Location: Shearwater
Flama22 wrote:
Tony wrote:
Flama smaller drives spin faster as there's less rotating mass.


Then wouldn't the specs indicate the drive is spinning faster than 10,000 RPM, which is the same speed as the regular Raptors? If you have two cars driving with wheel rotations of 2,000 RPM and one car has 15" wheels and the other has 17" wheels which one is going to be moving faster? :wink:


Neither (same as the what weighs more a lb of lead or a lb of feathers) but if each vehicle was travelling the same speed the 15" tires will have higher rpm.

If the speed (10,000 rpm) is taken at the spindle then the tip speed will slow down as you move out from there.

_________________
Cosmos-S / E8400 / Giga P35-DQ6 / 4X1 Ballistix PC2 8500 / Gigabyte 8800GTS 512 / Swiftech Apogee GT / MCR320/ MCP 665 Pump / 9X Yate Loons / Samsung 931BF

DFI Dark/Q6600 G0/Supertalent PC2 6400/HIS 3870 ICEQ3


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 12:07 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:34 am
Posts: 1117
Location: Eastern Passage
sswilson wrote:
Neither (same as the what weighs more a lb of lead or a lb of feathers) but if each vehicle was travelling the same speed the 15" tires will have higher rpm.


So:
15" @ 2,000 RPM = 17" @ 2,000 RPM

Yet:
RPM @ X Speed 15" > RPM @ X Speed 17"

Sounds contradictory to me. :shock:

If you cut each tire so that the tred could be stretched out flat which one would be longer (ie. have the larger circumference)? Now if you multiplied the static RPM (in this case 2,000) by those lengths which one would cover more distance in the given time span (lets say 1 minute since it is RPM)? If it covers more distance in the same amount of time wouldn't that mean it's traveling faster? :)

Not trying to be a prick or anything but all things kept equal, a larger platter circumference at a given RPM should be faster then one with a smaller circumference. One of the things a good disc defragmenting program will do is put commonly used files on closer to the edge of the platter so that it will get faster read/write times there. As you move towards the point of rotation however, the difference in speed between a smaller and larger circumference becomes less noticable until you theoretically reach the sorce and it becomes zero.


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:12 pm 

Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:31 pm
Posts: 295
Location: Shearwater
Yeah, I had that backwards.... :)

The outer edge has to travel further than the inner edge so it's actually traveling faster. :)

_________________
Cosmos-S / E8400 / Giga P35-DQ6 / 4X1 Ballistix PC2 8500 / Gigabyte 8800GTS 512 / Swiftech Apogee GT / MCR320/ MCP 665 Pump / 9X Yate Loons / Samsung 931BF

DFI Dark/Q6600 G0/Supertalent PC2 6400/HIS 3870 ICEQ3


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 1:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:34 am
Posts: 1117
Location: Eastern Passage
sswilson wrote:
Yeah, I had that backwards.... :)

The outer edge has to travel further than the inner edge so it's actually traveling faster. :)


I graciously accept your surrender. :wink: jk

And sorry for derailing this thread for a few posts too everyone!


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:07 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:42 am
Posts: 733
Basically the smaller drive will spin up to 10,000rpm faster & with wear/heat on the drive. These would be worth looking into I think. To bad I already put in my drive.

_________________
Windows 7 available here

Can you take on my brute?

See if you can beat this brute!

No try to beat me instead!


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:09 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:36 am
Posts: 1926
Location: The New Glasgow "Burbs"
I'd never spend that much on a hard drive.

_________________
| 4670K | GTX 650Ti Boost | 8GB Corsair | Z87-K | 240GB i520 + 1TB Black + 500GB Blue| XFi-XM| Phantom | 245B |


Top
Offline Profile Send private message E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:22 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:31 pm
Posts: 387
Location: Truro, Nova Scotia
Flama22 wrote:
I just came here to post the exact same link but you beat me to it. Anyways, the benchmarks look good but what's shocking/weird is that it's using a smaller drive size than "regular" desktop drives. The first thing I thought after reading that was that 10k RPM is going to be spinning faster on the older (larger) Raptors so how does this thing beat it in speed, but I guess it has a few different tricks to help it accomplish that.

Definitely an interesting piece of tech but I won't be buying one any time soon. :)


I Believe the review said it used smaller platters so there is less surface area for the heads to read, hence giving it a faster read write time...that would make sence to me...


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group