MysteryByte Computers http://mysterybyte.com/phpBB3/ |
|
Sandy Bridge is released! http://mysterybyte.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2646 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | CMDR Steve-O [ Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Sandy Bridge is released! |
http://www.semiaccurate.com/2011/01/02/introduction-sandy-bridge/ I'm usually one to copy/paste some images but it's well laid out over in S|A land. That being said I'm still very confused about the whole thing ![]() I'd look harder, but I'm not planning on buying this stuff (which includes awesome DRM at the chip level) but hopfully it's got good bang for ya buck. |
Author: | Hali_Newf [ Mon Jan 03, 2011 3:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
Some things regarding Sandy Bridge, excerpts taken from toms hardware "overclocking on an Intel platform is drastically different, and the LN2-drinking crowd probably won’t like it very much." Also which is neat for those who do alot of video encoding/decoding, is a dedicated block of silicon devoted to it. This will crush any other cpu with regards to encoding/decoding period. But for me personally this option is meh. Also which I think is a$$ backwards is the fact that intel puts the best onboard graphics option in desktop versions where one can and in most cases would have its own video card - which leaves the lower end graphics for laptops where people would like more horsepower. "It’s the value-oriented buyers with processor budgets between $100 and $150 (where AMD offers some of its best deals) who get screwed. The only two Sandy Bridge-based options under $175 are the Core i3-2100 and -2120 at 3.1 and 3.3 GHz, respectively. No Turbo, no BCLK option, no limited unlock—those chips are quite literally stuck. " at any rate to get the rundown, check out the conclusion section of the review. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/san ... 33-22.html |
Author: | Ern88 [ Mon Jan 03, 2011 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
I am really looking hard at the i5 2500K. Looks like the sweet spot. And beats out the i7 980 in most benchies. |
Author: | Dr_BenD_over [ Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
![]() |
Author: | CMDR Steve-O [ Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
Well, let me know how it goes ![]() |
Author: | Ern88 [ Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
ya I know Steve. But I have been sitting on my E8400 for quite a while now. I don't have any other choices for the 775 socket. either way I need to get a new mobo cpu ram combo. I am not going to get a quad for this thing. that would just be a lateral upgrade. I could probably hold off for a bit longer I guess. Hopefully AMD will have Bulldozer out soon. I just have a strong feeling that bulldozer isn't going to be that great against intel's new offering. |
Author: | Hali_Newf [ Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
Ern that point of view is true to a point unless all aspects are taken into acct. Be mindful of the upgrade itch ! head to head yes its more than likely better but will you tax that retardedly expensive cpu on anything you do at home? not likely , so why pay all that molah for something you won't actually 'use'. For most its bragging rights and when it comes to that small male appedage point of view - those can have it. I agree that the cpu you selected would be the middle ground and a very good choice if you go intel. I think bulldozer will offer very competative performance for alot less of your hard 'Ern'ed cash. I am not expecting, like you, a wicked setup from AMD that will beat out Intel from a strictly performance based point of view. What I do see happening is an offerring that gives consumers a very good solid performer that doesnt break the bank and in some instances may go neck n' neck in some games for 1/3 the cost. If this is true, count me in. |
Author: | CMDR Steve-O [ Mon Jan 03, 2011 9:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
Ern encodes and decodes Pir^H^H^H legally purchased videos like it's going out of style! |
Author: | Ern88 [ Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
Well, the i5 2500K is priced pretty good. And the ability to OC to almost 5 ghz on air alone. Man, you can't beat the price and performance. dollar for dollar that is a very good. I think I could get 3-4 years out of that before my next upgrade path. My E8400 has lasted over 3 years. Thats pretty good service in my opinion. Intel hasn't let me down. But when will we see this Bulldozer??? Q2 maybe Q3-4. |
Author: | Dr_BenD_over [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
I'm not seeing any at retail yet. It would most likely be the 2600K for me, I needs the HT for F@H. AMD is going to be a LONG time coming by the looks of things. |
Author: | Ern88 [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
My question is also. will the 5850 I have bottleneck with the i5 2500K? |
Author: | CMDR Steve-O [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
All depends at what rez yer playin' at, and how many gee-wiz effects you like to drool to. |
Author: | Ern88 [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
Steve, I play at 1650x1050. Since its the best my monitor will do. But am looking to get a 22 incher to do 1080P. abit later like in 3 months or bit. I try to play settings at max. But sometimes I have to turn some things down a notch and turn shadows off in some games (BlackOps) whats your take on this man. I need some insight bigtime before I take the upgrade plunge. |
Author: | CMDR Steve-O [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
I'd have to say anything quad-core and faster MHz would help ya out. your 5850 should be fine at 16x10. I play eyefinity so everything is a bottleneck (including my own neck hah). |
Author: | Ern88 [ Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sandy Bridge is released! |
Thanks Steve, I read something by a poster at Tom's saying that I wouldn't see any performance gain because the 5850 would bottle neck a CPU upgrade. I thought this was untrue but needed some insight. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |