Last visit was: It is currently Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:18 am


All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 277 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:09 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:31 pm
Posts: 387
Location: Truro, Nova Scotia
New Run...

12979

ImageImage

_________________
Image


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 7:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:09 pm
Posts: 1366
It's your 4850 holding you back I THINK.

Even @ 4.0 I dont think your breaking 14k.

But remember that 3dmark isn't a true test and measurement of your pc.

_________________
i5 2500K *5.2Ghz, Sabretooth P67, 4GB DDR3 1333, XFX 5770, Hyper 212+
Image
Image


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 7:35 pm 

Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:45 pm
Posts: 438
You seem to be on par for this hardware combination

Found this as a compare for 3DMark06

13,040

E8400 @ 3.6

4850 @ 700/1040

_________________
Image


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:07 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:31 pm
Posts: 387
Location: Truro, Nova Scotia
thanks fellas, i didnt do this to get a huge score or to improve performance, the computer runs whatever i have thrown at it, and thats all i need, i only did this to see if i could...now i will go back to 3600mhz, and die a happy man...unless i get a new system that is..lol..

_________________
Image


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:47 am 

Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:45 pm
Posts: 438
maverick_brent wrote:
...unless i get a new system that is..lol..


lol

_________________
Image


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 9:47 pm 

Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:45 pm
Posts: 438
i7 965 on air

27 x 155 or 4185MHz @ 1.414V

Sli'd BFG stock cooling, no extra voltage (yet)

Video clocks
Core 696MHZ
Shader 1440
Ram 1140
(in single card each will get 730, 1500, 1180)

If one wants to run SLI on an X58, then only the newest Nvidia (and yet to be Futuremark approved) drivers are the only option.

24221

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9059667

_________________
Image


Last edited by skiman on Sun Nov 30, 2008 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:42 am
Posts: 733
Maybe

http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.h ... VzaWFzdA==

_________________
Windows 7 available here

Can you take on my brute?

See if you can beat this brute!

No try to beat me instead!


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:28 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:22 pm
Posts: 267
Location: Middle Sackville
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8819153

_________________
I'm stressing, please with my rap, hopefully it's working
Because when your folks leave this earth, man, that shit be hurtingn Emotional traumas, enough to make you lose your ground No matter what happen just represent and put it down


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 8:22 pm 

Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:45 pm
Posts: 438
Found a little time today to further refine for 3DM'06.

A little hint, disabling hyper-threading not only gets much higher clocks at lower temps and voltages, it seems in 3DM'06 a little better score.


26843

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9071475

_________________
Image


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:57 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 90
Hmmm I'm a little confused...I have my system overclocked to 3.3ghz (165x20) but for some reason I'm getting a lower core then when I first benched @ stock settings after a fresh install of vista. This is really annoying..I wonder what's going on. I've never been able to get higher than I did on that very first run of 3d mark 06.

http://service.futuremark.com/home.acti ... 646338EDBA

_________________
My PC:
Cote i7 920
Gigabyte EX58-UD5
6 gigs Corsair DDR3 1600
ATI HD 4870 512mb
========================
My MAC:
2.2GHZ C2D Macbook Pro
4Gigs DDR2 Ram
Nvidia 8600GT


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:31 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:53 pm
Posts: 90
[quote="skiman"]i7 965 on air

27 x 155 or 4185MHz @ 1.414V

[/quot]

Your CPU is at 1.4V??? Wow, that seems really high to me. Do you notice any heat issues with that high of a frequency and voltage?

_________________
My PC:
Cote i7 920
Gigabyte EX58-UD5
6 gigs Corsair DDR3 1600
ATI HD 4870 512mb
========================
My MAC:
2.2GHZ C2D Macbook Pro
4Gigs DDR2 Ram
Nvidia 8600GT


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:52 am 

Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:45 pm
Posts: 438
Fx wrote:
Your CPU is at 1.4V??? Wow, that seems really high to me. Do you notice any heat issues with that high of a frequency and voltage?


It seems to be on par with other 965 at this speed and I'm too concerned as the temps are fine over the days I was setting up the system. Additionally the voltage seems to read high by .06V as compared to a meter and I do have load calibration on the REII turned off.

Strange, but I can go a 29x133 without so much as a bump to any of the voltages, beyond that it needs a big jump in voltages.

Knowing of the validation process, some processors easily pass the top level of validation, while other processors just barely pass the same tests.


I think my i7 965 is of average quality, or slightly less than average as based upon freq vs Voltage; but I can certainly say it is not cherry picked.

I've been keeping an eye on the benchmarks results and see I'm doing better than some, but not as good as others, with one cat reaching 5GHz stable on air and still under 1.3V...now that is a nice CPU.

_________________
Image


Top
Offline Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Official 3DMark 06 Thread
PostPosted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 4:05 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:06 am
Posts: 1860
Location: Halifax ( From Newfoundland)
With stock settings on the cpu (3.009 Ghz) ..Just ran 3d mark06 on winxp 32bit.

17516 3dmarks


Top
Offline Profile Send private message E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Official 3DMark 06 Thread
PostPosted: Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:56 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:36 am
Posts: 1926
Location: The New Glasgow "Burbs"
15895

@ 1920x1200, damn these beat the $730 monster that was the fastest card available at this time last year. (ok, not quite a year but darn close)

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7811941

_________________
| 4670K | GTX 650Ti Boost | 8GB Corsair | Z87-K | 240GB i520 + 1TB Black + 500GB Blue| XFi-XM| Phantom | 245B |


Top
Offline Profile Send private message E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Official 3DMark 06 Thread
PostPosted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:38 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:36 am
Posts: 1926
Location: The New Glasgow "Burbs"
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11662573

19078 from the 4770's @ 3.6 with a 830/850 OC on the cards.

_________________
| 4670K | GTX 650Ti Boost | 8GB Corsair | Z87-K | 240GB i520 + 1TB Black + 500GB Blue| XFi-XM| Phantom | 245B |


Top
Offline Profile Send private message E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 277 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group