nahelm Processors are not what you thik they are

skiman · **Joined:** Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:45 pm **Posts:** 438

Clarke wrote:

yes pick one up and please i want to see what all of the hype is about

but i know it wont have f..k all on my q9550 because it is going to be 4.8ghz on my pelt setup
but i am ready for any challange anyone wants to bring

Going to be 4.8Ghz? You mean you haven't got someone to get it there for you yet? :lol:

Nothing so sweet as getting it there for youself.

E8500 holding what record?

A Q9770 holds Vantage top spot,

E8600 hold top 06.

My old CPU scores on this dog 9450 still has you beat by a few hundred.

The latest benches for an i7 965 I can find, run with an ES @ default and very slight OC to 3.77 with single and crossfire 4870s (non x2 512MB variant).

I think based upon this, that when x2 are added alone, they are going hover around 30k, never mind any higher clocks on anyhting.

http://diybbs.enet.com.cn/thread-3002755-1-1.html

Clarke · **Posted:** Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:08 am

no i said the e8600 held the record as of last wed
maybe it changed

no none has came here to over clock for me i have been doing it all myself

remember i am on air not water so @ my proven 4.333 ghz thats damn good
ran @4.33 for a few weeks without a glitch untill that thermaltake psu went out the window and took my cpu with it

(NOT MY FAULT) psu shorted and caused a bad surge
the mobo came out just fine

also i cant viiew that link says its a dead link????

skiman · **Joined:** Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:45 pm **Posts:** 438

The link works fine.

http://diybbs.enet.com.cn/thread-3002755-1-1.html

Done an Asus production board with with what could be a production bios and perhaps final drivers.

Tony · **Joined:** Tue May 01, 2007 10:42 am **Posts:** 733

They used a V8 & dual X2's as well, :shock:

skiman · **Joined:** Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:45 pm **Posts:** 438

Tony wrote:

They used a V8 & dual X2's as well, :shock:

I don't think those are X2s. Both cards have the 6 pin connectors vs the 8 and 6, and the screen shot shows 512MB.

sbeeze316 · **Joined:** Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:10 pm **Posts:** 562

those are definitely not x2's

Dr_BenD_over · **Posted:** Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:27 pm

sbeeze316 wrote:

those are definitely not x2's

Seconded, they be far too puny.

Tony · **Joined:** Tue May 01, 2007 10:42 am **Posts:** 733

Only took a quick glance & everything is in some weird numerical script for me also.

Now that I took a closer look they are just 4870's as I see the dual 6pin sockets. Quite observant you guys are lol. To bad they didn't use the best for this test. It would have made for much better 3dMark score I would imagine.

sbeeze316 · **Joined:** Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:10 pm **Posts:** 562

Tony wrote:

To bad they didn't use the best for this test. It would have made for much better 3dMark score I would imagine.

Depending on the resolution of the run of course

Tony · **Joined:** Tue May 01, 2007 10:42 am **Posts:** 733

This is true.

ronedogg · **Joined:** Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:23 am **Posts:** 887

lol jesus. skiman knows his stuff. lol question him all u want and u will get more then all the answers u need LOL.
Clarke is gonna build a sick system its gonna be cool. i cant wait to help him build it.

not about the biggest e pecker. because i would have yas all beat by a foot or 2 LOL

ps skiman i have a mineral oil pc going now

skiman · **Joined:** Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:45 pm **Posts:** 438

ronedogg wrote:

ps skiman i have a mineral oil pc going now

good stuff, nice and quiet eh! Still at room temp, or are you going to take the oil subzero?

Clarke · **Posted:** Thu Oct 30, 2008 11:05 pm

oil cooled ? good god

e-pecker naa mine is bigger
:wink:

nahelm Processors are not what you thik they are

Who is online